Where did Henry Richmond come from?
Open research · Great Grimsby, and one generation up
Henry is named from the front — by his marriage, his children and his burial — but not yet from behind. His own baptism is the new wall.
An incomer to Grimsby — and a candidate across the water
No Henry Richmond baptism is indexed at Grimsby (or anywhere in Lincolnshire) for c.1705–1722, so he came into the town from elsewhere — and the trail points across the Humber, to Beverley. There a John Richman was raising a family in just the right years: Henry (baptised 9 March 1715), then John (1718), William (1721), Mary (1723), Ann (1726) and Margaret (1729). The old naming custom fits it hand in glove — our Henry's children carry those very names (John, William, Mary, Anne, Margaret), and his first son, John (1745), takes the name a man traditionally gave for his own father's father. On this reading Henry's father is John Richman of Beverley.
It is a strong probability, not a proof: the Beverley–Grimsby crossing rests on the name, the age and the naming alone — no record yet carries the man over the estuary — and these are the commonest names of the century (a second Henry, son of a John, was baptised inland at Bolton Percy in 1710). To do: John Richman's marriage (c.1710–14, Beverley), for Henry's mother and John's own origin; and any Beverley or Hull waterman link that would carry the family to the Lincolnshire shore.
His end, and his second family
The 1805 burial makes Henry about ninety-two — a remarkable age that wants the register leaf read to confirm it. After Mary's death about 1757 he married an Elizabeth, by whom came Robert (1759) and Catharine (1760); that second marriage, and Elizabeth's own surname, are not yet found. And his wife's line waits too — see Mary Loggon's page: Loggon is an uncommon Lincolnshire name, and her parents are the parallel rung up.