Brock Family History

George Brock

1619 – 1656
✓ Validated against records · 2026-07-20

George Brock was baptised at Belton, in the Isle of Axholme, on 17 October 1619 — a son of Francis Brocke and his wife Elizabeth Taylor, of a family long settled in the parish. Then, in 1634, a boy of fourteen or so, he was bound apprentice in York — to William Scrafton, barber surgeon: the working surgeon of the age, who let blood, drew teeth and set bones as well as kept the razor. The card index to the city's register of apprentices carries him — “son of Fran. Brocke of Belton, Lincs, yeoman” — a yeoman's younger son, sent out of the Isle to learn a city trade.

The published register of York's freemen — where an apprentice who served out his term would ordinarily be enrolled — has no Brock in it from first to last: the term never carried George into the freedom, and the city's freemen's rolls never hear of him again. Why he came home no record states; but the registers allow a reading, offered as a reading only. Alexander, the first of Francis's sons, was nearly five years George's elder; and on 13 May 1636 the Belton register buried an “Alex: Brock, singleman” — an unmarried man, the entry now read at the page. Which Alexander it holds the register cannot alone say, for the parish had another of the name, also young enough to be single; but “singleman” rules out any married or widowed man. If it was the brother, then two years before their father died George had become Francis's eldest surviving son — and the land, not the razor, would have been his portion. What is certain is the frame: bound to York in 1634; his father buried in December 1638, “Ffrancis Brock, yeoman”; George at the altar at Belton in 1643, and every later record of him a Belton record.

He came of age as the kingdom slid into civil war; and in December 1643, weeks after the fighting had reached Lincolnshire, he married Hellinor Sealand — the wedding entered in the registers of both Belton and Amcotts, on a page that also records the burial of an unbaptised infant. Two children followed: Alexander in 1643, and Elizabeth in 1645.

Then the record thins. From the middle of the 1640s the Belton register, like registers across England, falls nearly silent, and Hellinor is heard of no more — no burial for her survives. When the entries pick up again George has a second wife, Alice. Their marriage is nowhere recorded — it was made in the years when such records were simply not kept — but the register itself supplies the proof of the union: in January 1651, on a near-empty page still written in Latin, their daughter was baptised “Susanna Brocke, filia Georgii et Aliciæ” — Susanna, daughter of George and Alice.

Four more children followed — George and William, baptised together in March 1653, Francis in 1655, and Peter in 1656 — and it is through Francis, who settled at Haxey, that this line descends. After Peter's baptism George himself passes out of the record: no burial survives for him around Belton, and the year of his death, somewhere near the Restoration, is unknown. Alice long outlived him; a Belton burial of December 1692 is very possibly hers.

Composed from validated records · 2026-07-20
Birth
Baptised Belton in Axholme 17th October 1619. Son of Franncisci.
Marriage
It appears George Brock married twice. 1.To Hellinor Sealand (probably born 1st September 1620) on the 6 December 1643 in Belton shortly after the first fighting in Lincolnshire in 1643 during the Civil War. There are no more children recorded for the marriage after 1645. There is no record of her burial. 2.Assuming it is the same George that is father to children in Belton during 1651-1656, he is likely to have married Alice at some point between 1645 and 1651 but there is no marriage recorded in Lincolnshire.
Death
No record of a George Brock's burial in or around the Belton area after 1656. The restoration was in 1660 following the death of Oliver Cromwell in 1658.
Parents
Francis Brocke and Elizabeth Taylor
Siblings
Alexander Brock baptised 18 December 1614 Anne Brock baptised 18 April 1617 in Belton Maria Brock baptised 17 May 1618 in Belton (d. 23 May 1618) George Brock baptised17th October 1619 in Belton John Brock baptised 14th Feb 1621 (d 15th Feb 1621) in Belton Robert Brock baptised 10th May 1624 in Belton Henricus baptised Brock 27 April 1628 in Belton Elizabeth Brock baptised 24 January 1630 (Possibly died 21st January 1631) in Belton Francis Brock baptised 7th December 1632 (died 9 December 1632) in Belton
Children
To George and Hellina Alexander Brock baptised 5th March 1643 in Belton Elizabeth Brock baptised 28th October 1645 in Belton To George and Alice (who possibly died 1692) Susanna Brock 7th January 1651 in Belton George Brock 15th March 1653 in Belton (to Alice and George) William Brock 15th March 1653 in Belton (to Alice and George) Francis Brock 28th December 1655 in Belton (to Alse and George) Peter Brock 6th Feb 1656 in Belton (to Alice and George)
1692
Possible burial of Alice Brock on 6th December at Belton
In your grandmother’s words · from her notebook

Family

Parents

The children of Francis & Elizabeth

· · · George Brock b. 1619this page · · · · ·

Marriages

ABSpouseAlice Brockd. 1692

The children of George & Alice

FBChild · the line continuesFrancis Brockemain line1655–1705

The children of George & Hellinor Sealand

Historical context

An island in revolt

The Isle of Axholme that George Brock grew up in was already at war with itself before the kingdom's war began. In 1626 Charles I had set the Dutch engineer Cornelius Vermuyden to drain Hatfield Chase and the Isle; roughly a third of the drained land — including some 7,400 acres of the commons of the manor of Epworth, the common-country of Belton, Haxey and Epworth — was settled on Vermuyden and his investors, and Dutch and French Protestant tenants were planted at Sandtoft, a few miles north of Belton. The commoners, who had lived off those wetlands for centuries, never accepted it: lawsuits from 1627, riots from 1630.

When the King's government fell, the Islanders took their chance. Under the Commonwealth the Epworth commoners — led by Daniel Noddel, an Epworth attorney, and championed by the Leveller John Lilburne — went to war on the drainage: in October 1650 they smashed the settlers' fences and drove off their cattle; in May 1651 they pulled down eighty-two houses and a mill at Sandtoft; and that October they barred the settlers from their own church, Lilburne telling them, as it was remembered, “This is our common; you shall come here no more, unless you be stronger than we.”

No record puts a Brock in that crowd, and none is needed: they were commoners of exactly these parishes, in exactly these years. The quarrel over the drowned commons was the standing argument of George's world — running right alongside the civil war, and outlasting it.

Composed for this site from published local history — the family’s world, not one of Mum’s records.

Life

Confirmed — anchored to a recordEstimated — inferred
1619

Born

17 October 1619

Baptizat’ George Brork filij Ffrancisci — 17mo [October 1619].— Baptism register, Belton (1619)
All Saints', Belton — the church where George was baptised on 17 October 1619. Photographed by Jon Brock on a family visit, 21 July 2026. © Jon Brock 2026.
All Saints', Belton — the church where George was baptised on 17 October 1619. Photographed by Jon Brock on a family visit, 21 July 2026. © Jon Brock 2026.
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Read at the image record Evidence
Confirmed against the original record, read at the image:
  • Baptism register, Belton (1619) — Belton (All Saints), Isle of Axholme — Lincolnshire Archives; read at the register image (findmypast browse, Belton PAR 1/2), 21 July 2026. The curate John Baldwin's hand — his first full year keeping the book; the signatures at the page's foot include Robert Broughton, of Beltoft's godly circle. Also indexed in Lincolnshire Baptisms (findmypast) and England Births & Christenings 1538–1975 (FamilySearch). read at the image
1634

Bound apprentice to a York barber-surgeon

1634 at York

Brocke, George (son of Fran. Brocke of Belton, Lincs, yeoman) app.d to Wm. Scrafton, barber surgeon 1634 D12/70b.— Apprenticeship — the York register of apprentices (1634)
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Confirmed in index record Evidence
Found in an index or transcript — the original page not yet read:
  • Apprenticeship — the York register of apprentices (1634) — Card index to the York register of apprentices' indentures — original entry D12, fol. 70b (York City Archives, held at Explore York Libraries & Archives; the register entry itself not yet seen — copy order drafted). Card read and downloaded at the image: FamilySearch, “York, Yorkshire, England. Archive Records”, image 633 of 2,190, ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-CSDP-H776-K; read 20 July 2026. index entry — original not yet seen
1636

An Alexander Brock, “singleman”, is buried

1636 at Belton

Sepult’ Alex: Brork singleman — decimo tertio die [13 May 1636].— Burial of an Alexander Brock, Belton (1636)
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Read at the image record Evidence
Confirmed against the original record, read at the image:
  • Burial of an Alexander Brock, Belton (1636) — Belton — Lincolnshire Archives; read at the register image (findmypast browse, Belton PAR 1/2), 21 July 2026. The register styles him “singleman” — its term for an unmarried adult man (it uses the same word for others); the line above buries William Medley, yeoman, the same day. Which Alexander the entry holds — Francis's son (baptised 1614, then twenty-one) or the parish's other Alexander (baptised 1608, William's son) — it cannot alone settle: “singleman” rules out any married or widowed man, but both of the young Alexanders could have been single. Francis's will remains the decider. read at the image
1643

The war comes to the Trent

In the summer of 1643 the war reached the Isle's doorstep. On 28 July, at Gainsborough — nine miles up the Trent from the Isle's ferry crossing — a Parliamentarian relief force under Sir John Meldrum and Oliver Cromwell beat the Royalists under Sir Charles Cavendish, who was driven into the river's water-meadows and killed; the spot was long after called Candish Bog. The victory did not hold: the Earl of Newcastle's far larger northern army came up within days, and Gainsborough surrendered on 31 July. Then on 11 October, at Winceby, Cromwell and Sir Thomas Fairfax — fighting together for the first time — routed a Royalist relief force, and much of Lincolnshire passed to Parliament.

The Isle itself sat just across the water from all of it, its crossings the gates between the two banks. George Brock married Hellinor Sealand that December, weeks after Winceby — an ordinary wedding at the edge of an extraordinary year.

The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Historical context Evidence
Background composed for this site from published history. It frames the family’s world; it is not one of Mum’s records.
1643

Married Hellinor Sealand

about 1643

Nupti: Georgius Brock, et Hellinor Sealand — December 1643.— Marriage register, Belton (1643)
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Confirmed in index record Evidence
Found in an index or transcript — the original page not yet read:
  • Marriage register, Belton (1643) — Belton — Lincolnshire Archives. The marriage was also entered in the register at Amcotts, 6 December 1643 (England Marriages 1538–1973, FamilySearch). The entry above it records the burial of an unbaptised infant — a war-winter page. index entry — original not yet seen
1651

The baptism that names Alice

1651 at Belton

Bapt: Susanna Brocke, filia Georgii et Aliciæ — 7 January 1651.— Baptism of his daughter Susanna, Belton (1651)
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Mum’s record Evidence
From Janet Brock’s research, cited — not yet re-verified at the image:
  • Baptism of his daughter Susanna, Belton (1651) — Belton register, January 1651 — Lincolnshire Archives. One of a handful of entries surviving from the Commonwealth years, still in Latin. It is the record that proves George's second marriage: no wedding to Alice was ever registered, but their daughter's baptism names them together. The line above records a child of Sandtoft, the drainers' colony destroyed by the Isle's commoners that same year. from Mum’s research
1653

Marriage made civil

In August 1653 the Commonwealth took marriage away from the church altogether. Under the Marriage Act, couples were to publish their intentions three times — in church after morning exercise, or in the market-place on three market-days — and then marry before a Justice of the Peace; every parish was to elect a lay “Parish-Register” to keep a new book. Registration passed out of the minister's hands, and the old Latin of the registers gave way to English.

The change is visible on the very pages of the Belton book: by October 1655 it reads, in a new hand and a new tongue, “Published the intentions of the Marriage of Willm Wells of this parish, Bachelor, and Isabell Pygitt of the same…” George's own second marriage, to Alice, fell in precisely these overturned years — which is why no record of it exists, and why their daughter's baptism must speak for it.

The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Historical context Evidence
Background composed for this site from published history. It frames the family’s world; it is not one of Mum’s records.
1656

The record falls silent

about 1656

No record of a George Brock's burial in or around the Belton area after 1656. The restoration was in 1660 following the death of Oliver Cromwell in 1658.— From Janet Brock’s research
The record image is with the family — family sign-in
Estimated Evidence
From Janet Brock’s research notebook. Estimated — inferred, not directly recorded.
1692

His widow

Alice outlived George by many years; the Belton register records the burial of an Alice Brock on 6 December 1692 — very possibly her.

Records & papers

4 record images are with the family — family sign-in

Our research

York, and the road home

Open research · the apprenticeship and the wills

The 1634 card places George in York, bound to a barber surgeon; the freemen’s register shows no Brock ever enrolled free — he was never enrolled free. What remains open:

  • The original indenture entry — York register of apprentices, D12 fol. 70b (Explore York Libraries & Archives). Photograph order drafted — a purchase, and the family’s decision. The entry may give the binding’s date, term and premium.
  • His father’s will — Francis Brocke, proved at Stow 1638–40 (BRS vol. 57, p. 22; the act calendared at p. 53). Photograph order to Lincolnshire Archives drafted — a purchase, and the family’s decision. May name George, and settle who stood heir in 1638.
  • The 1636 Alexander burial — now read at the image. The register buries “Alex: Brork, singleman” on 13 May 1636 — an unmarried man, which rules out any married or widowed Alexander; but the parish’s other Alexander (baptised 1608, William’s son) could also have been single at twenty-eight. The entry narrows the question without closing it — Francis’s will remains the decider.
  • Ladder upgrades — the 1619 baptism is now read at the image (17 October 1619, Baldwin’s hand); the 1643 marriage still stands at index — the register image is reachable on findmypast (a future image read).

Settled: how the line holds through the Civil War

The decades from 1642 to 1660 broke English parish registration — ministers ejected, registers abandoned, and from 1653 marriage itself taken from the church and given to the Justices. In this family the damage is exact: the two marriages that carry the male line — George to Alice, and their son Francis to Margaret — were never recorded at all.

But the line does not rest on the marriages. Each generation is tied to the next by a baptism that names the father, and those survive right through the gap:

  • 1619 — George. “Baptizat’ George Brork filij Ffrancisci” — son of Francis (Belton; read at the image).
  • 1651 — Susanna. “Susanna Brocke, filia Georgii et Aliciæ” — daughter of George and Alice: the entry that proves the unrecorded second marriage (Belton).
  • 1655 — Francis. “Francis Brocke, son of George and Alce” — the son who carries the line (Belton).
  • 1692 — Thomas. “Thomas, son of Francis Brock” — Francis's son, at Haxey.

So the descent is documented father to son across the whole upheaval, on the very pages that show it. One more detail from the 1651 page: the entry immediately above Susanna's records a child “de Santofte” — of Sandtoft, the drainers' colony that the Isle's commoners destroyed that same year. The family and the revolution share a page.